Następne zdjęcie
Show photos
1 / 5
© / Measurements at the dyno showed power of 78 PS regardless of the type of fuel, because it turned out it was only petrol each time poprzednie następne
Sector: LPG

Skoda Rapid LPG - insanely reasonable

Skoda Rapid LPG - insanely reasonable ©

Many drivers would prefer to buy those cars that inspire emotions, even if they kept them parked all the time with their engines turned off. But when the time comes to make the decision, they choose reason over heart. Skoda Rapid, especially the LPG version, tops the list of practical cars.
Skoda Rapid TwinPower© gazeo.comConnotations with the Volkswagen Passat seem quite reasonable – Skoda chases their superior from Wolfsburg in terms of quality, price and image

The 21st century Rapid (Skoda had already had two models of the same name – one before World War II and shortly thereafter, and one in the 1980's) looks like a smaller version of the Octavia. No wonder, because with a length of 4.48 m, it’s almost as long as the first generation of its older “sister”, and even beats it when it comes to wheelbase (2.6 to 2.51 m). So in the range of cars manufactured by the company from Mlada Boleslav, this model replaces Fabia sedan (already out of production for some time), but also partly Octavia, which – thanks to this new Skoda model – was allowed to grow a bit without leaving a gap in the company’s offer.

Typically for Skoda, Rapid gives the buyer more than its price would suggest. Although formally it’s a B-segment car, with its size as well as interior and booth capacity (550 l!) it’s almost compact class. With a price starting at approx. 9500 EUR (though with a discount in effect at the time of writing this article, Rapid is available at 9370 EUR with an LPG system already installed), it’s more expensive than Dacia Logan or the twin duet of Citroën C-Elysée/Peugeot 301, but it also has a certain advantage – a liftback body type, which combines the elegant presence of a sedan with the practical solution of a tailgate lifted along with the glass.

Skoda Rapid TwinPower - rear view© gazeo.comElegant sedan appearance and hatchback’s practicality combined in one body is a successful compromise

Thinking outside the box is indeed a specialty of the Czech brand. For many years, Octavia has been the only or one of very few compact liftbacks, so has the Superb in D class (its dual function tailgate opens like in a liftback or a sedan), while Roomster is a little bit like a van, but not quite. Now we have the Rapid, also available in Spaceback version, somewhere between a hatchback and an estate car, presenting a more “youth” look, though devoid of some practical characteristics (due to a smaller trunk).

But let’s not waste more time, the test car is waiting. It has the only MPI engine offered (perhaps it’s here mainly because it can be adapted to LPG, but also because it allows to reduce the price below 50 thousand PLN – approx. 12 thousand EUR) – a 3-cylinder power unit with a 1.2 liter capacity and 75 PS with torque at 112 Nm (we got 78 PS regardless of the type of fuel and 110/111 Nm on gas/petrol at our test bench). Technically speaking, it’s still the same old 1.6 liter engine, only with 1 cylinder and ¼ of power taken away. Is it still enough to drive a car of this size smoothly? We were skeptical, but it turns out that for urban driving and a leisure extra-urban journeys, three cylinders and 75 PS are enough. Well, 75 PS is enough, 3 cylinders not quite…

Skoda Rapid TwinPower - the 1,2-litre, 3-cylinder MPI engine© gazeo.comA three-cylinder engine reduces the cost of consummables (such as spark plugs and ignition cables), but why does it have to be so loud?

The problem is, this small engine is surprisingly loud. Its design makes it rattling in a very distinctive way, and it’s not really muted that well, so at higher speeds you can’t fail to notice it. But apart from that, we can’t complain. The engine provides decent dynamics, and if you don’t speed too much, its fuel consumption won’t be too high. Of course, the dynamics are not breathtaking, but if you’re buying a workhorse and want the poor creature to compete in races, you can only blame yourself.

But the main factor that lowers the cost of driving is not the engine itself, but the gas system dedicated to it, a Landi Renzo Omegas. The only thing in which it’s different from systems dedicated to 1.4 and 1.6 MPI engines, is that the injection rail (manufactured by MED) has 3 sections instead of 4. Taking into account traffic jams, this car could really use a start/stop system to further reduce operating costs, even with this basic engine. Especially that a warmed-up engine starts straight on gas, thanks to setting up the Omegas appropriately. Though Rapid – according to its trip computer that does not take into account switching between petrol and LPG – is able to settle for 6.3 liter per 100 km in the city (late evening and night) and 5.6-5.8 l/100 km in extra-urban areas (driving at 70-90 km/h), being stuck in traffic jams may double its needs. That’s why it’s much better to have it powered by gas, not fluid.

The toroidal Stako tank, placed in the spare wheel well (with the wheel replaced by a repair kit), holds 42 liters of gas, which even in the city should be enough to drive for 350-400 km without refueling. Going outside the city allows to drive for even 500-600 km, unless someone stubbornly tries to overtake everything that stands in his way and forgets about speed cameras. Though something tells us that a target user of Rapid – married with children – won’t feel the d…

Why does the engine generate
the same power on petrol and LPG?
The answer awaits you on page two!

Left: 50%


  • LPG and CNG cars
  • Hybrids and EV's
  • News and tips

Robert Markowski
source: Skoda, own information 2012-2018 All rights reserved. By using this site you acknowledge that you accept its Terms and Conditions